<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 344 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order to set aside the AO&#039;s assessment, directing a fresh assessment after proper inquiries. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming that the AO&#039;s order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The principles of natural justice were deemed satisfied, and the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263 was validated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 344 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order to set aside the AO&#039;s assessment, directing a fresh assessment after proper inquiries. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming that the AO&#039;s order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The principles of natural justice were deemed satisfied, and the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263 was validated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>