<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 227 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals. It confirmed the deletion of insurance expenses and depreciation on vehicles, labor expenses, and truck hire charges, emphasizing the lack of substantiated challenges. The Tribunal also affirmed the relief against interest on FDRs and canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961, due to the estimated nature of additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 227 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals. It confirmed the deletion of insurance expenses and depreciation on vehicles, labor expenses, and truck hire charges, emphasizing the lack of substantiated challenges. The Tribunal also affirmed the relief against interest on FDRs and canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961, due to the estimated nature of additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>