<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 213 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62742</link>
    <description>The appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under sections 143(3)/147/251 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1995-96 regarding a Non-Resident Indian gift received by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s compliance with directions and emphasized the necessity of witness cross-examination before relying on statements. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and a fresh assessment was directed with proper opportunities for the assessee and addressing jurisdictional irregularities. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 213 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62742</link>
      <description>The appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under sections 143(3)/147/251 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1995-96 regarding a Non-Resident Indian gift received by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s compliance with directions and emphasized the necessity of witness cross-examination before relying on statements. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and a fresh assessment was directed with proper opportunities for the assessee and addressing jurisdictional irregularities. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>