<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the reclassification of rental income under the head &#039;business&#039; instead of &#039;property.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the temporary nature of the business suspension and the commercial exploitation of assets, instructing the Assessing Officer to review the claimed expenses for allowability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the reclassification of rental income under the head &#039;business&#039; instead of &#039;property.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the temporary nature of the business suspension and the commercial exploitation of assets, instructing the Assessing Officer to review the claimed expenses for allowability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>