<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 1,50,000 addition confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal considered the business nature, inventory reconciliation, and alleged undue pressure during the survey as justifications for removing the addition. The AO&#039;s arbitrary additions were found conjectural and lacking evidence, leading to a misappreciation of facts by the CIT(A). The Tribunal concluded in favor of the assessee, ordering the deletion of the Rs. 1,50,000 addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 1,50,000 addition confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal considered the business nature, inventory reconciliation, and alleged undue pressure during the survey as justifications for removing the addition. The AO&#039;s arbitrary additions were found conjectural and lacking evidence, leading to a misappreciation of facts by the CIT(A). The Tribunal concluded in favor of the assessee, ordering the deletion of the Rs. 1,50,000 addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>