<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had set up its business and was entitled to claim expenses and depreciation. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the AO to examine the claims in accordance with the law, allowing expenses and depreciation as permissible. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was to be decided after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had set up its business and was entitled to claim expenses and depreciation. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the AO to examine the claims in accordance with the law, allowing expenses and depreciation as permissible. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was to be decided after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>