<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62697</link>
    <description>Business expenditure claims depend on proving a direct business nexus and genuine service use. Donations to educational institutions, guest-house costs without evidence of exclusive employee or technician use, and certain foreign-exchange and selling-agent commission claims were not accepted on the claimed basis. Medical retainership for employees, holiday-home welfare expenditure, borrowing interest absent proof of non-business diversion, road and drainage repairs, business-protection legal costs, superannuation contributions and textile committee fees were treated as allowable. Excess sales-tax collections retained from customers were treated as taxable receipts, while charity collections and security deposits were not treated as trading receipts. Business-linked accommodation receipts were business income, without notional rent where none was charged; customs-penalty computation required fresh determination after penalty reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62697</link>
      <description>Business expenditure claims depend on proving a direct business nexus and genuine service use. Donations to educational institutions, guest-house costs without evidence of exclusive employee or technician use, and certain foreign-exchange and selling-agent commission claims were not accepted on the claimed basis. Medical retainership for employees, holiday-home welfare expenditure, borrowing interest absent proof of non-business diversion, road and drainage repairs, business-protection legal costs, superannuation contributions and textile committee fees were treated as allowable. Excess sales-tax collections retained from customers were treated as taxable receipts, while charity collections and security deposits were not treated as trading receipts. Business-linked accommodation receipts were business income, without notional rent where none was charged; customs-penalty computation required fresh determination after penalty reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>