<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 170 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the order directing two separate assessments for a partnership firm for distinct periods in the assessment year 1976-77. It held that the situation constituted a case of succession rather than a mere change in the constitution of the firm, supporting the decision for separate assessments based on the admission of new partners. The Tribunal distinguished relevant case law and upheld the AAC&#039;s ruling, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 170 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the order directing two separate assessments for a partnership firm for distinct periods in the assessment year 1976-77. It held that the situation constituted a case of succession rather than a mere change in the constitution of the firm, supporting the decision for separate assessments based on the admission of new partners. The Tribunal distinguished relevant case law and upheld the AAC&#039;s ruling, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>