<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62657</link>
    <description>Enhancement of sales turnover was not sustained because the alleged book discrepancies were plausibly explained. The purchase entries and payment entries related to transactions within the same assessment year, the date variation was minor and did not indicate false accounting, and the apparent sales mismatch was resolved by including finance commission and sales to registered dealers. As no suppression of sales was established, the basis for the revised tax assessment failed and the turnover addition could not be upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62657</link>
      <description>Enhancement of sales turnover was not sustained because the alleged book discrepancies were plausibly explained. The purchase entries and payment entries related to transactions within the same assessment year, the date variation was minor and did not indicate false accounting, and the apparent sales mismatch was resolved by including finance commission and sales to registered dealers. As no suppression of sales was established, the basis for the revised tax assessment failed and the turnover addition could not be upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>