<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 32 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62638</link>
    <description>The Vice President of the Appellate Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed by the IAC under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment year 1962-63 was not justified. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear findings of concealed income and concrete evidence to support penalty imposition. The matter was referred back to the Bench for further proceedings in accordance with the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 32 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62638</link>
      <description>The Vice President of the Appellate Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed by the IAC under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment year 1962-63 was not justified. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear findings of concealed income and concrete evidence to support penalty imposition. The matter was referred back to the Bench for further proceedings in accordance with the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>