<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no deliberate intent to evade submitting the audit report with the return. It determined that there was a reasonable cause for the initial failure, considering the subsequent submission and overall circumstances. As a result, the penalty under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was canceled, with directions for the Assessing Officer to follow suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no deliberate intent to evade submitting the audit report with the return. It determined that there was a reasonable cause for the initial failure, considering the subsequent submission and overall circumstances. As a result, the penalty under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was canceled, with directions for the Assessing Officer to follow suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>