<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) and addressing the issues related to the addition of Rs. 20,500 under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in imposing the penalty, as the assessee&#039;s explanation was deemed bona fide and supported by evidence such as confirmation letters for some creditors and loans given by cheques. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 15,785 was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) and addressing the issues related to the addition of Rs. 20,500 under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in imposing the penalty, as the assessee&#039;s explanation was deemed bona fide and supported by evidence such as confirmation letters for some creditors and loans given by cheques. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 15,785 was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>