<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 110 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the delay in filing tax returns without reasonable cause led to the restoration of penalties imposed by the assessing officer for the assessment years in question. The appeals of the revenue were allowed, and the cross objections filed by the assessees were deemed non-maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized the assessees&#039; responsibility to file returns and rejected reasons such as illness of the counsel or rush of work as valid excuses for delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:14:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 110 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the delay in filing tax returns without reasonable cause led to the restoration of penalties imposed by the assessing officer for the assessment years in question. The appeals of the revenue were allowed, and the cross objections filed by the assessees were deemed non-maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized the assessees&#039; responsibility to file returns and rejected reasons such as illness of the counsel or rush of work as valid excuses for delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>