<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 94 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order, upholding the validity of assessments completed under the Amnesty Scheme and summary assessment scheme. The Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked justification based on actual errors of fact or law. The appeals were allowed, and the assessments were deemed valid, with the Tribunal highlighting the binding nature of benevolent circulars on income-tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:51:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 94 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order, upholding the validity of assessments completed under the Amnesty Scheme and summary assessment scheme. The Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked justification based on actual errors of fact or law. The appeals were allowed, and the assessments were deemed valid, with the Tribunal highlighting the binding nature of benevolent circulars on income-tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>