<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 175 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to compute additions based on profits embedded in sale proceeds for undisclosed transportation charges and allowing claimed expenditure without applying s. 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source due to lack of valid contracts. The decisions favored the assessee due to absence of agreements, emphasizing the significance of valid contracts in tax deduction cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 175 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to compute additions based on profits embedded in sale proceeds for undisclosed transportation charges and allowing claimed expenditure without applying s. 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source due to lack of valid contracts. The decisions favored the assessee due to absence of agreements, emphasizing the significance of valid contracts in tax deduction cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>