<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 260 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62503</link>
    <description>Additions based only on loose-paper entries found in search were held unsustainable where the Revenue produced no corroborative material and the notings appeared to be rough estimates rather than actual transactions; the deletion was affirmed. A capital introduction issue was remanded for fresh verification because a new explanation as to the source of funds required examination of the alleged lender&#039;s creditworthiness and corresponding records. For household expenses, the Tribunal held that some estimate was justified on the assessee&#039;s status and withdrawals, but the Assessing Officer&#039;s figure was excessive; the addition was therefore sustained only to a limited extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 260 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62503</link>
      <description>Additions based only on loose-paper entries found in search were held unsustainable where the Revenue produced no corroborative material and the notings appeared to be rough estimates rather than actual transactions; the deletion was affirmed. A capital introduction issue was remanded for fresh verification because a new explanation as to the source of funds required examination of the alleged lender&#039;s creditworthiness and corresponding records. For household expenses, the Tribunal held that some estimate was justified on the assessee&#039;s status and withdrawals, but the Assessing Officer&#039;s figure was excessive; the addition was therefore sustained only to a limited extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>