<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 260 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the second appeal filed by the assessee, M/s L.N. Export, quashing the assessment under section 158BC(c) due to serious procedural lapses and non-observation of technicalities by the Revenue authorities. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed invalid, emphasizing the importance of adhering to technicalities for ensuring substantial justice and cautioning against whimsical application of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 260 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the second appeal filed by the assessee, M/s L.N. Export, quashing the assessment under section 158BC(c) due to serious procedural lapses and non-observation of technicalities by the Revenue authorities. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed invalid, emphasizing the importance of adhering to technicalities for ensuring substantial justice and cautioning against whimsical application of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>