https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62496 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the addition of Rs. 1,20,828 as income from undisclosed sources made by the ITO. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence linking the entries in the exercise book to the assessee, and the ITO's actions lacked proper basis. Additionally, discrepancies in the treatment of income from trucks and partnerships further supported the deletion of the addition. The Department's appeal was rejected, affirming the deletion of the additional income by the CIT(A). en-us Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:51:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62496 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the addition of Rs. 1,20,828 as income from undisclosed sources made by the ITO. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence linking the entries in the exercise book to the assessee, and the ITO's actions lacked proper basis. Additionally, discrepancies in the treatment of income from trucks and partnerships further supported the deletion of the addition. The Department's appeal was rejected, affirming the deletion of the additional income by the CIT(A). Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62496