<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 87 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for concealment of income were inappropriate. Despite the appellant&#039;s admission of income, the penalties were deemed unwarranted after considering the arguments and relevant case law. The penalties imposed by the Income Tax Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were cancelled, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:48:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 87 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for concealment of income were inappropriate. Despite the appellant&#039;s admission of income, the penalties were deemed unwarranted after considering the arguments and relevant case law. The penalties imposed by the Income Tax Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were cancelled, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>