<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 110 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62483</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the lower authorities were justified in rejecting the switch to the hybrid system of accounting. The income was determined on a mercantile basis as the hybrid system did not allow for the proper deduction of true profits and gains. The change in accounting method was not considered bona fide, and Section 145(2) of the IT Act was applied for a best judgment assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 110 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62483</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the lower authorities were justified in rejecting the switch to the hybrid system of accounting. The income was determined on a mercantile basis as the hybrid system did not allow for the proper deduction of true profits and gains. The change in accounting method was not considered bona fide, and Section 145(2) of the IT Act was applied for a best judgment assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>