<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 106 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, adjusting the profit assessment under s. 41(2) and accepting the explanation for the investment in the new truck. It emphasized the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s financial history and rejected unfounded suspicions without concrete evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 106 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, adjusting the profit assessment under s. 41(2) and accepting the explanation for the investment in the new truck. It emphasized the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s financial history and rejected unfounded suspicions without concrete evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>