<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as the assessee had discharged the initial burden under the Explanation to the section. The Tribunal emphasized that the Income Tax Officer did not adequately consider the facts and explanations on record. Consequently, the penalties were cancelled, and both appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:53:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as the assessee had discharged the initial burden under the Explanation to the section. The Tribunal emphasized that the Income Tax Officer did not adequately consider the facts and explanations on record. Consequently, the penalties were cancelled, and both appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>