<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 113 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the penalty imposed by the ITO, emphasizing the invalidity of the penalty due to a defective notice and the presence of a reasonable cause for non-submission of the revised estimate under s. 212(3A) by the assessee. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the penalty was deemed legally invalid and not imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:12:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 113 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the penalty imposed by the ITO, emphasizing the invalidity of the penalty due to a defective notice and the presence of a reasonable cause for non-submission of the revised estimate under s. 212(3A) by the assessee. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the penalty was deemed legally invalid and not imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>