<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 296 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order u/s 263, concluding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was legally tenable. It held that the CIT was unjustified in deeming the order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal emphasized that only receipts constituting income for the current year should be taxed, supporting the assessee&#039;s accounting method and treatment of time share sales income. The bifurcation of income was consistent with industry norms and contractual obligations, and taxing the entire receipt in the year of accrual would distort the income for that year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 296 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order u/s 263, concluding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was legally tenable. It held that the CIT was unjustified in deeming the order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal emphasized that only receipts constituting income for the current year should be taxed, supporting the assessee&#039;s accounting method and treatment of time share sales income. The bifurcation of income was consistent with industry norms and contractual obligations, and taxing the entire receipt in the year of accrual would distort the income for that year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>