<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 270 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the expenditure on the railway siding, deeming it as revenue expenditure. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, permitting the interest deduction under section 36(1)(iii) for the interest paid on borrowed capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 270 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the expenditure on the railway siding, deeming it as revenue expenditure. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, permitting the interest deduction under section 36(1)(iii) for the interest paid on borrowed capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>