<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 159 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62384</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that payments made under a technical collaboration agreement, including air fare and incidental charges, were taxable at a rate of 40% under section 115A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the payments constituted salary and concluded they were technical fees. It upheld the assessing officer&#039;s decision to tax the entire payment, emphasizing the disallowance of deductions for such expenses under section 44D. The Tribunal clarified that its decision only related to tax collection and did not prevent further assessments. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the tax liability on the payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 159 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62384</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that payments made under a technical collaboration agreement, including air fare and incidental charges, were taxable at a rate of 40% under section 115A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the payments constituted salary and concluded they were technical fees. It upheld the assessing officer&#039;s decision to tax the entire payment, emphasizing the disallowance of deductions for such expenses under section 44D. The Tribunal clarified that its decision only related to tax collection and did not prevent further assessments. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the tax liability on the payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>