<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 209 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the relationship between the assessee and its distributors was on a principal-to-principal basis, not a principal-to-agent basis. It concluded that the margins earned by the distributors were trade discounts rather than commission. As a result, Section 194H of the Income-tax Act, which requires tax deduction at source for commission payments, was not applicable. Consequently, the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on these transactions and could not be treated as an &quot;assessee in default&quot; under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 209 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the relationship between the assessee and its distributors was on a principal-to-principal basis, not a principal-to-agent basis. It concluded that the margins earned by the distributors were trade discounts rather than commission. As a result, Section 194H of the Income-tax Act, which requires tax deduction at source for commission payments, was not applicable. Consequently, the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on these transactions and could not be treated as an &quot;assessee in default&quot; under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>