<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 120 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee firm, finding no dissolution of the partnership despite the exit of a partner as per the original partnership deed. It concluded that there was no actual distribution of assets among partners and no transfer of goodwill to the expelled partner. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the capital gains assessment, affirming the business&#039;s uninterrupted continuity post the partner&#039;s departure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 120 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee firm, finding no dissolution of the partnership despite the exit of a partner as per the original partnership deed. It concluded that there was no actual distribution of assets among partners and no transfer of goodwill to the expelled partner. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the capital gains assessment, affirming the business&#039;s uninterrupted continuity post the partner&#039;s departure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>