<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 124 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple grounds, allowing deductions for provident fund contributions paid before the due date, excluding agricultural income from book profit under Section 115JB, and recognizing the sale of &quot;Boyce Estate&quot; as a split sale, not a slump sale. The Tribunal also upheld the treatment of long-term capital loss on shares as capital loss, permitting the set-off against long-term capital gains. Disallowances of replanting expenditure and license fees were rejected, affirming them as legitimate business expenses. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the non-capital gains nature of the sale of grevillea trees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 124 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple grounds, allowing deductions for provident fund contributions paid before the due date, excluding agricultural income from book profit under Section 115JB, and recognizing the sale of &quot;Boyce Estate&quot; as a split sale, not a slump sale. The Tribunal also upheld the treatment of long-term capital loss on shares as capital loss, permitting the set-off against long-term capital gains. Disallowances of replanting expenditure and license fees were rejected, affirming them as legitimate business expenses. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the non-capital gains nature of the sale of grevillea trees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>