<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 122 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the undisclosed income from the toddy and arrack business should be assessed in the hands of M/s Malabar Associates, the firm, and not the individual assessee. The decision was based on statutory provisions and evidence showing the income belonged to the firm, not the individual partner. The President, concurring with the Judicial Member, emphasized preventing double taxation by assessing the income in the firm&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 122 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the undisclosed income from the toddy and arrack business should be assessed in the hands of M/s Malabar Associates, the firm, and not the individual assessee. The decision was based on statutory provisions and evidence showing the income belonged to the firm, not the individual partner. The President, concurring with the Judicial Member, emphasized preventing double taxation by assessing the income in the firm&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>