<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 107 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62348</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed filing of a return was held to be unjustified where the assessee showed reasonable cause for the delay. The return was filed two months late, but the assessee had sought extension and explained that accounts could not be finalised because the accountant was ill and absent, and business had expanded. The explanation was accepted as sufficient because time was needed to finalise the accounts and determine income before filing a correct return. Accordingly, penalty under section 271(1)(a) was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:39:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 107 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62348</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed filing of a return was held to be unjustified where the assessee showed reasonable cause for the delay. The return was filed two months late, but the assessee had sought extension and explained that accounts could not be finalised because the accountant was ill and absent, and business had expanded. The explanation was accepted as sufficient because time was needed to finalise the accounts and determine income before filing a correct return. Accordingly, penalty under section 271(1)(a) was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>