<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 92 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed as the refusal to register the assessee-firm was based on an incorrect interpretation of the requirement to specify individual shares. The deeds, when read together, did specify the shares of the continuing partners. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing the ITO to grant registration for the assessment year 1977-78 and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 92 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed as the refusal to register the assessee-firm was based on an incorrect interpretation of the requirement to specify individual shares. The deeds, when read together, did specify the shares of the continuing partners. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing the ITO to grant registration for the assessment year 1977-78 and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>