<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 238 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the disallowance of Rs. 17,23,568 made by the Assessing Officer. The disallowance of interest expenditure was upheld as the Tribunal found no functional nexus between the assessee&#039;s business and the activities of the associate concerns to justify the interest-free advances. The diversion of funds did not serve the business purpose of the assessee, leading to the restoration of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 238 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the disallowance of Rs. 17,23,568 made by the Assessing Officer. The disallowance of interest expenditure was upheld as the Tribunal found no functional nexus between the assessee&#039;s business and the activities of the associate concerns to justify the interest-free advances. The diversion of funds did not serve the business purpose of the assessee, leading to the restoration of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>