<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 247 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxability of interest income earned by the assessee-company during the construction period as revenue receipt, following the decision in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals &amp;amp; Fertilizers Ltd. The interest received on bank deposits before the commencement of business was deemed of revenue nature and taxable, rejecting the assessee&#039;s contention for capital treatment. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT (Appeals) order, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals. In a separate judgment for the assessment year 1995-96, the Tribunal rejected the limitation ground not pressed by the authorized representative, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 247 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxability of interest income earned by the assessee-company during the construction period as revenue receipt, following the decision in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals &amp;amp; Fertilizers Ltd. The interest received on bank deposits before the commencement of business was deemed of revenue nature and taxable, rejecting the assessee&#039;s contention for capital treatment. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT (Appeals) order, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals. In a separate judgment for the assessment year 1995-96, the Tribunal rejected the limitation ground not pressed by the authorized representative, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>