<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 296 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the reassessment of interest liability under section 234B(3) to consider the tax paid under section 140A. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of deduction under section 80HHC by adjusting unabsorbed investment allowance, dismissing the assessee&#039;s argument that the issue was debatable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 296 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the reassessment of interest liability under section 234B(3) to consider the tax paid under section 140A. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of deduction under section 80HHC by adjusting unabsorbed investment allowance, dismissing the assessee&#039;s argument that the issue was debatable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>