<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 192 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the lower authorities erred in denying the benefit of section 44AF(5) due to the late filing of the audit report. The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative intent was not to deny the benefit of lower profits in such cases. As a result, the AO was directed not to apply section 44AF(1), allowing the assessee to claim the business loss as initially reported.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 192 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the lower authorities erred in denying the benefit of section 44AF(5) due to the late filing of the audit report. The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative intent was not to deny the benefit of lower profits in such cases. As a result, the AO was directed not to apply section 44AF(1), allowing the assessee to claim the business loss as initially reported.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>