<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 179 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62303</link>
    <description>Amounts withdrawn from NRE accounts and used to acquire immovable property were treated as eligible for exemption under section 5(1)(iib) of the Gift-tax Act because the payments had a direct nexus with the assessee&#039;s NRE funds and the cheques being issued to the vendors was only a technical point. The assessee, being a person resident outside India, was not regarded as having gifted a share in property before title passed under the sale deed. The balance amounts were traced to loans to the wife and son-in-law and to the assessee&#039;s own bank accounts, so they were not taxable gifts. The related income-tax and wealth-tax additions, being consequential, also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 179 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62303</link>
      <description>Amounts withdrawn from NRE accounts and used to acquire immovable property were treated as eligible for exemption under section 5(1)(iib) of the Gift-tax Act because the payments had a direct nexus with the assessee&#039;s NRE funds and the cheques being issued to the vendors was only a technical point. The assessee, being a person resident outside India, was not regarded as having gifted a share in property before title passed under the sale deed. The balance amounts were traced to loans to the wife and son-in-law and to the assessee&#039;s own bank accounts, so they were not taxable gifts. The related income-tax and wealth-tax additions, being consequential, also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>