<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 214 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude the interest amount awarded by the arbitrator from the contract receipts due to pending litigation and subsequent legal developments. It also allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for a 30% deduction of expenses related to the interest income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering subsequent legal events for substantial justice and corrected the relief amount to reflect the actual addition made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 214 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude the interest amount awarded by the arbitrator from the contract receipts due to pending litigation and subsequent legal developments. It also allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for a 30% deduction of expenses related to the interest income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering subsequent legal events for substantial justice and corrected the relief amount to reflect the actual addition made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>