<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 154 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to revise the assessments for the relevant years in line with the method consistently followed by the assessee for accounting profit from terminated kuries. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was unjustified in confirming the additions of surplus amounts in terminated kuries accounts as income for the respective years, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s actual realization basis for profit recognition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 154 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to revise the assessments for the relevant years in line with the method consistently followed by the assessee for accounting profit from terminated kuries. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was unjustified in confirming the additions of surplus amounts in terminated kuries accounts as income for the respective years, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s actual realization basis for profit recognition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>