<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 156 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62288</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of Rs. 1 lakh claimed as business expenditure was upheld, as it was deemed not a normal business expenditure and against public policy. However, the issue of disallowance of Rs. 54,298 under Section 43B for outstanding bonus liability was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for verification and adjustment based on actual disbursement before the due date for filing the return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:02:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 156 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62288</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of Rs. 1 lakh claimed as business expenditure was upheld, as it was deemed not a normal business expenditure and against public policy. However, the issue of disallowance of Rs. 54,298 under Section 43B for outstanding bonus liability was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for verification and adjustment based on actual disbursement before the due date for filing the return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>