<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 182 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62272</link>
    <description>Reduction of a partner&#039;s profit share on reconstitution of a partnership firm is treated as a taxable gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958 where the partner receives no consideration in money or money&#039;s worth. The alleged benefits from admission of new partners, including capital contribution, sharing of future losses, and participation in the business, may advantage the firm but do not constitute consideration flowing to the partner for surrendering part of his interest. On that footing, surrender of a 20% share in the partnership was treated as a taxable gift, and the reciprocal arrangements were held insufficient to exclude gift-tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 182 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62272</link>
      <description>Reduction of a partner&#039;s profit share on reconstitution of a partnership firm is treated as a taxable gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958 where the partner receives no consideration in money or money&#039;s worth. The alleged benefits from admission of new partners, including capital contribution, sharing of future losses, and participation in the business, may advantage the firm but do not constitute consideration flowing to the partner for surrendering part of his interest. On that footing, surrender of a 20% share in the partnership was treated as a taxable gift, and the reciprocal arrangements were held insufficient to exclude gift-tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>