<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 71 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62245</link>
    <description>Reassessment of estate duty was impermissible where the Department relied on partnership reconstitution, profit-sharing ratios, refunds and interest already considered in the original assessment; a different view of the same material amounted only to a change of opinion. Refunds arising after death did not constitute property passing on death in the stated circumstances. Excess tax-liability allowances, initially made provisionally and later affected by related assessments, were matters for rectification rather than reassessment under section 59 absent special circumstances. The Revenue&#039;s reassessment grounds therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 71 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62245</link>
      <description>Reassessment of estate duty was impermissible where the Department relied on partnership reconstitution, profit-sharing ratios, refunds and interest already considered in the original assessment; a different view of the same material amounted only to a change of opinion. Refunds arising after death did not constitute property passing on death in the stated circumstances. Excess tax-liability allowances, initially made provisionally and later affected by related assessments, were matters for rectification rather than reassessment under section 59 absent special circumstances. The Revenue&#039;s reassessment grounds therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>