<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 149 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the revised return filed by the assessee was voluntary and complete. Consequently, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deemed unwarranted. The decision was based on the voluntary nature of the disclosure before any detection by the Revenue, distinguishing it from prior judicial precedents cited by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:40:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 149 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the revised return filed by the assessee was voluntary and complete. Consequently, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deemed unwarranted. The decision was based on the voluntary nature of the disclosure before any detection by the Revenue, distinguishing it from prior judicial precedents cited by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>