<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 122 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62219</link>
    <description>A provision for purchase tax liability is deductible where the assessee has a real and reasonable apprehension of liability and the relevant sales tax proceedings have not finally negatived that liability. The rejection of the exemption claim in provisional proceedings, together with the fact that assessments for the relevant years remained unfinished, supported the existence of a continuing liability. A later exemption order did not undermine the position for the earlier accounting period in which the provision was created. The provision was therefore not to be denied merely because the liability had not yet crystallised by final assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 122 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62219</link>
      <description>A provision for purchase tax liability is deductible where the assessee has a real and reasonable apprehension of liability and the relevant sales tax proceedings have not finally negatived that liability. The rejection of the exemption claim in provisional proceedings, together with the fact that assessments for the relevant years remained unfinished, supported the existence of a continuing liability. A later exemption order did not undermine the position for the earlier accounting period in which the provision was created. The provision was therefore not to be denied merely because the liability had not yet crystallised by final assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>