<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the godown rent received by the assessee from the Director General of Supplies &amp;amp; Disposals under the Clearing and Forwarding contract should be classified as &#039;Income from business&#039;. The key factors included the integrated nature of the contract, the provision of temporary storage as part of C &amp;amp; F operations, the retention of possession and control by the assessee, and the income arising in the ordinary course of business. The Tribunal overturned the reclassification by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s initial classification. The Departmental appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the godown rent received by the assessee from the Director General of Supplies &amp;amp; Disposals under the Clearing and Forwarding contract should be classified as &#039;Income from business&#039;. The key factors included the integrated nature of the contract, the provision of temporary storage as part of C &amp;amp; F operations, the retention of possession and control by the assessee, and the income arising in the ordinary course of business. The Tribunal overturned the reclassification by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s initial classification. The Departmental appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>