<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 113 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62188</link>
    <description>Reduction in an assessee&#039;s profit share on admitting his son as a partner was not a taxable gift where the incoming partner contributed capital and was engaged as a working partner for office work and general administration under the partnership deed. The consideration was treated as adequate because the diminished profit share was supported by the son&#039;s capital contribution and participation in the business. Revenue authorities&#039; reliance on other cases was distinguished on the basis that those decisions involved materially different facts, including absence of capital contribution by the incoming partner. Gift-tax was therefore not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 113 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62188</link>
      <description>Reduction in an assessee&#039;s profit share on admitting his son as a partner was not a taxable gift where the incoming partner contributed capital and was engaged as a working partner for office work and general administration under the partnership deed. The consideration was treated as adequate because the diminished profit share was supported by the son&#039;s capital contribution and participation in the business. Revenue authorities&#039; reliance on other cases was distinguished on the basis that those decisions involved materially different facts, including absence of capital contribution by the incoming partner. Gift-tax was therefore not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>