<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CWT lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment order as it had merged with the appellate order, following the principle established by the Kerala High Court and the Special Bench. Despite conflicting decisions, the Tribunal upheld the merger principle, invalidating the CWT&#039;s revision. The property valuation issue was not addressed due to the jurisdictional finding. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the CWT&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CWT lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment order as it had merged with the appellate order, following the principle established by the Kerala High Court and the Special Bench. Despite conflicting decisions, the Tribunal upheld the merger principle, invalidating the CWT&#039;s revision. The property valuation issue was not addressed due to the jurisdictional finding. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the CWT&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>