<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 103 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that share income accrues in a partnership only when the accounts are closed. Therefore, the husband&#039;s share income should be clubbed with the assessee&#039;s income only for the period when the assessee was a partner in the firm, from June 1, 1975, to November 30, 1975. Share income after the assessee ceased to be a partner, from January 1, 1976, to May 31, 1976, should not be included in the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 103 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that share income accrues in a partnership only when the accounts are closed. Therefore, the husband&#039;s share income should be clubbed with the assessee&#039;s income only for the period when the assessee was a partner in the firm, from June 1, 1975, to November 30, 1975. Share income after the assessee ceased to be a partner, from January 1, 1976, to May 31, 1976, should not be included in the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>