<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 105 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62173</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act was not justified in this case. The Tribunal found that the assessee had shown reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return, including the illness of the accountant. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Income Tax Officer and upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 105 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62173</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act was not justified in this case. The Tribunal found that the assessee had shown reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return, including the illness of the accountant. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Income Tax Officer and upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>