<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (5) TMI 56 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the bad debts written off by the assessee-firm, originally due to the predecessor firm, were deductible under Section 36(2)(i)(b) of the IT Act. The debts retained their trading nature, and the assessee was entitled to the deduction, resulting in a modification of the assessment in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:10:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (5) TMI 56 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the bad debts written off by the assessee-firm, originally due to the predecessor firm, were deductible under Section 36(2)(i)(b) of the IT Act. The debts retained their trading nature, and the assessee was entitled to the deduction, resulting in a modification of the assessment in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>